Skip to main content
EN|ES
844-321-LEMON·

Resources · Lemon Law & MMWA

Lemon Law Arbitration Boards, When to Use Them and When to Skip Them

Lemon Law Arbitration Boards, When to Use Them and When to Skip Them

State-run arbitration boards (the good ones)

Several states administer their own lemon-law arbitration programs. These are typically run by the state Attorney General or a state-created board, funded by manufacturer registration fees, and binding on the manufacturer (consumer can usually reject the decision and go to court).

Florida New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board, state-run, binding on manufacturer when consumer accepts the decision. Generally consumer-favored.

Vermont Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board, state-run, manufacturers required to participate.

New York AG Lemon Law Arbitration Program, strong state-administered program with consumer-favored procedural rules.

Massachusetts AG arbitration, fast, free, consumer-favored.

New Jersey Lemon Law Unit, state-administered through the Division of Consumer Affairs.

Manufacturer-funded arbitration (BBB AUTO LINE, NCDS), be cautious

Many states require, or strongly encourage, consumers to first arbitrate through a manufacturer-funded program before going to court. Common programs: BBB AUTO LINE (Better Business Bureau Auto Line) and NCDS (National Center for Dispute Settlement).

These programs are funded by manufacturer dues. Historically, consumer-success rates are lower than state-run boards. Arbitrators are often industry-affiliated. Decisions are binding on manufacturer but not on consumer in most states, you can reject and proceed to court.

Our practical take: do the manufacturer-funded arbitration when your state requires it (otherwise you can't sue), but treat it as a procedural hoop, not a real shot at a fair outcome. Save your real fight for federal MMWA court.

Federal MMWA, bypass state arbitration entirely

Important federal preemption rule: Magnuson-Moss claims can typically be filed in federal court WITHOUT first exhausting state-mandated arbitration. The exception is when the manufacturer has a federally-approved informal dispute settlement procedure (IDSP), but most state arbitration programs don't qualify.

This is why we often file in federal court first: it bypasses the manufacturer-funded arbitration step entirely and gets us to a real adjudicative forum with MMWA fee-shifting attached. We've had cases settle within 60 days of filing in federal district court that had been languishing in BBB AUTO LINE for 6+ months.

How to decide

If your state has a strong state-run program (FL, VT, NY, MA, NJ, MD, ME), use it. Free, fast, generally consumer-favored.

If your state only has manufacturer-funded options, file MMWA in federal court directly. Skip the BBB AUTO LINE drag unless your state's lemon-law statute requires exhaustion.

If you're unsure, talk to a lemon-law attorney. We do this triage all day; we can usually tell within a minute of hearing the state and the manufacturer which path makes sense.

Have a defective vehicle? Find out if you have a case.

Case eligibility quiz. We tell you whether the facts support a federal MMWA or state lemon-law claim.

Take the case eligibility quiz →

About the authors

Joshua E. Feygin, Esq.

Joshua E. Feygin, Esq.

Co-Founder · Founding Attorney

Joshua founded Lemonaid Firm with a clear thesis: defective-vehicle owners should walk away with cash, not a return trip to the dealer. He leads the firm's federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and state lemon-law practice.

The Florida Bar · District of Columbia Bar · Vermont Bar Association · Alabama State Bar

Michael A. Citron, Esq.

Michael A. Citron, Esq.

Partner · Federal Appeals & Complex Litigation

Michael brings deep federal-court and Eleventh Circuit appellate experience to the firm's most complex cases, and leads the cases where manufacturers refuse reasonable settlements and force litigation.

The Florida Bar · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit