California has Song-Beverly with its civil-penalty stick. Michigan is the operational headquarters of Ford, GM, and Stellantis, meaning Big Three engineering decisions are made in Detroit but litigated nationwide. The Michigan New Motor Vehicle Warranty Act is the rule of the road in Big Three lemon-law cases filed at home. Here's how the two states stack up against each other.
Side-by-side comparison
| California | Michigan | |
|---|---|---|
| Presumption | California Song-Beverly: 4 attempts OR 2 attempts for a safety defect OR 30 days OOS in 18 months / 18,000 miles. | Michigan: 4 attempts OR 30 days OOS within first 24,000 miles or warranty period. |
| Practical takeaway: Similar thresholds. Michigan's mileage-based window (24,000 miles) is more lenient than California's calendar-and-mileage combo. | ||
| Statute | Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1790–1795 (Song-Beverly). | Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.1401 (Michigan New Motor Vehicle Warranty Act). |
| Practical takeaway: Song-Beverly is more developed and powerful; Michigan's statute is more procedural and less penalty-driven. | ||
| Civil penalties | California Song-Beverly § 1794(c): up to 2× actual damages for willful violations. | Michigan: standard damages + attorney fees, no statutory civil-penalty multiplier. |
| Practical takeaway: California's 2× penalty is unmatched. Michigan's case-fee economics are still strong but lack the penalty stick. | ||
| Arbitration | California: manufacturer-sponsored only (BBB AUTO LINE / NCDS), not required. | Michigan: manufacturer-sponsored optional; BBB AUTO LINE is the common path. |
| Practical takeaway: Neither state requires consumer arbitration before suit. Both allow direct federal MMWA filing. | ||
| Federal venue | C.D., N.D., E.D., S.D. Cal., 9th Circuit. | E.D. Mich., W.D. Mich., 6th Circuit. |
| Practical takeaway: Both circuits favor consumers on MMWA fee-shifting. Michigan's E.D. Mich. is in Detroit, putting Big Three defendants on home turf. | ||
The verdict
California's edge: the Song-Beverly civil-penalty provision drives larger settlements. Manufacturers settle Song-Beverly cases at higher values to avoid the 2× exposure.
Michigan's edge: jurisdiction over the Big Three's home court, discovery against Ford, GM, or Stellantis happens in their home circuit, which can be a strategic advantage on document production.
Why MMWA wins regardless: federal MMWA gives identical fee-shifting in both states. We typically file Song-Beverly + MMWA in California for the civil-penalty stick. In Michigan we file Michigan lemon-law + MMWA, the manufacturer is at home and can't run discovery delays.
Michigan's edge: jurisdiction over the Big Three's home court, discovery against Ford, GM, or Stellantis happens in their home circuit, which can be a strategic advantage on document production.
Why MMWA wins regardless: federal MMWA gives identical fee-shifting in both states. We typically file Song-Beverly + MMWA in California for the civil-penalty stick. In Michigan we file Michigan lemon-law + MMWA, the manufacturer is at home and can't run discovery delays.
Compare both states for your case.
Take the case eligibility quiz. We'll tell you which path, state lemon law, federal MMWA, or both, gives your specific facts the most leverage.
Take the case eligibility quiz →
